Maybe it’s time we go back to
the basics…
I must
admit I get sentimental just thinking about the “good ole days” of dating and
courtship. I remember when I was growing
up a guy would ask a woman out on a date without any other expectation other
than enjoying her company for the evening.
Women, on the other hand, wouldn’t dare invite a man in her house on the
first date, especially if she lived alone, not even for a cup of coffee. Nowadays, it seems those dating rituals have
changed but unfortunately haven’t made dating any better or easier for innocent
young lovers.
So why
has dating changed so much over the years?
Well, it’s complicated! But let’s
start with a little history lesson. In
the book by Stephanie Coontz, “Marriage, A History”, the author surmises that
in ancient civilizations upper class families were much more involved in the
“dating” lives (I’m using the term dating loosely here) of their children
because family resources were at stake and could jeopardize the wealth and
inheritance the family had accumulated.
“Commoners” or lower class families as they were known at the time “dated”
and married for practical reasons.
Raising a family and running a household placed serious demands on men
and women. For instance, men were
involved in farming and field work while women had to bear children who would eventually
be responsible for performing certain duties taking some of the burden off of
their parents. So, as you can see, men
and women needed each other to ensure their own survival.
Fast
forward to a time when I believe the term “dating” actually began, Coontz
states that “for a period of time, it was inconceivable that people would
choose their mates on the basis of something as fragile and irrational as
love…it was a serious threat to social order”.
But by the late 17th and 18th century, there was a
shift that occurred introducing this new concept of looking for love or finding
your soulmate as opposed to earlier generations when the practical demands and
societal pressures were the basis for your search. The author asserts that critics of this new
age idea warned that society could be opening “Pandora’s box” with such “free
choice and egalitarianism”. For example, how then would young people,
particularly women, choose the right type of mate without help from parents or wise
elders in the community? And as time
went on, the “free love” movement began to produce many “out of wedlock” births
from young men and women as accurately predicted by critics of this movement.
But if
we’re to be honest with ourselves, we all want to date and eventually marry for
love, right? Besides, who wants to be
with someone who makes them unhappy? We
wouldn’t want to have it any other way! However,
as you can see from our history, there are many other factors to consider
besides love. You’re also evaluating
this person to determine if they would be a good fit for you long term. For example, if you’re a woman dating someone
who can’t even pay for a simple date night out, you may want to re-evaluate
your options as that person may not be financially stable or fit for you at
this time. If you’re a man and you
desire to have kids but the woman you’re dating isn’t even caring or nurturing
to the kids in her own family, you may have a problem.
With the
rise of feminism and the Women’s Liberation Movement, dating became even more
complicated because although women gained more rights outside of the home,
women still wanted the same preferential treatment by men as they did in the
previous generations, particularly in the courting process. Men, on the other hand, no longer saw the
need to be as chivalrous since women could now pay for their own meal and
essentially take care of themselves. The
1960’s and 1970’s created a time of great social change and unrest that we are
still trying to figure out in the world today.
In the
book, “Manning Up”, Hymowitz writes that social groups have always been
involved in providing scripts for young people to follow in dating for
marriage. She states “there was always a good deal of adult
supervision in the form of chaperones, church dances, community socials and
curfews”. As opposed to the dating
rituals of today which are virtually non-existent. The question we have to ask ourselves is how
this has helped us as a society have better relationships. Maybe having a few dating rules and rituals
in our personal repertoire isn’t such a bad idea after all.
But were
society’s rules and rituals for dating really worth it? Listen, I know dating is complicated and I
don’t profess to have all the answers but I do think there were some dating scripts
that were worth their weight in gold. As
a woman, you need to evaluate a man not based solely on your feelings for him (which
can result from lust and changing hormones in the beginning) but how he respects
you as a person and can ultimately can provide for a household. That’s why rules were formed. They knew when young lover’s hearts and
emotions are involved, they’re not thinking too clearly and miss the key things
about a person that ordinarily would raise “red flags” that the person they’re
dating may not have their best interests at heart.
You
see, in the beginning of the courtship, dating should be fun and frivolous but
you’re also in the process of choosing the right person. You’re allowed to date as many people as
possible to determine the right fit. And
contrary to popular belief, there is really no such thing as “exclusivity” when
you’re not married to someone, particularly in the courtship. I believe this dating trend came about as a
result of couples wanting to be sexually active with their partner and consequently
wanting to control their partner’s sexual activities outside of the
relationship. Unfortunately, there is no
way to guarantee your partner is going to be “sexually exclusive” to you even
when they’ve made that promise. At least
when you’re at the point of engagement, you and your mate have made an official
commitment to each other as evidenced by a ring and probably won’t want to
screw it up.
Engagement
then, was really meant for exclusivity as viewed by earlier generations and was
thought to culminate in marriage. Once a
couple decided upon engagement, all previous lovers would be eliminated from
their search. The couple could now focus
on each other without distraction.
Oppositely, in modern times, engagement is thought to be solely for the
purposes of wedding planning. In fact,
most of the engagement process is riddled with wedding planning rather than
focusing on the deeper aspects of the person to be clear if this is the person
you can see yourself with for the rest of your life. Maybe it’s time we revisit these dating rituals
rather than throwing out the “baby with the bath water”.
To sum
this up, dating has changed tremendously over the years. From the practical demands of finding someone
to run a household to today’s ideals of finding someone in which to cherish and
love. But with these changing times,
we’ll need to change how we date as well.
The courtship process can still be a fun and exciting way to find the
one you love but we’ll need to use some of those dating rules and rituals our
elders taught us to ensure we meet and mate with the right person. Sadly, there are no more wise elders in our
community watching over us, but you do have a wide resource of books and
literature written directly to help you in this process. And with a few of these techniques and our own
moral compass, we’ll be able to make long lasting changes to the dating process
for generations to come!
Thanks for reading
Please visit my website at www.liveloveaspire.com
for more information on our relationship coaching services and for a free 15
minute consultation.